tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6888282.post872684873329921564..comments2024-03-07T00:03:12.584-07:00Comments on John's Corner of the World: Cold Fusion actually real?John Holzmannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14849211055450293089noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6888282.post-29262332979355268182009-04-05T20:09:00.000-06:002009-04-05T20:09:00.000-06:00Theoretically cold fusion is impossible according ...Theoretically cold fusion is impossible according to the principles of Quantum Mechanics, the reason why the physicists refuse to accept the occurrence of the phenomenon.<BR/>The nuclear chemist Mitch Andre Garcia showed by very easy calculations that cold fusion occurrence is theoretically impossible, from the laws of Quantum Mechanics, in a Chemistry Blog where he is the administrator.<BR/><BR/>However cold fusion is theoretically impossible because Quantum Mechanics does not consider the zitterbewegung (zbw) as a helical trajectory of the electron (the zitterbewegung appears in the Dirac equation of the electron, but the quantum physicists did not interpret the zbw as a helical trajectory).<BR/><BR/>By interpreting the zitterbewegung from a new viewpoint, by considering it as a helical trajectory of the electron, cold fusion becomes theoreticall possible, as Guglinski has shown to Mitch Andre Garcia, along a discussion in the topic “THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COLD FUSION AND COLD FUSION”, which can be seen in the link:<BR/>http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=17140.0<BR/><BR/>Look at the Guglinski’s « Reply #8 on: September 24, 2007 ».<BR/><BR/><BR/>So the chemists are now getting knowledge that cold fusion is theoretically possible thanks to the adoption of the new interpretation for the zitterbewegung, and they are undertaking the performance of cold fusion experiments, because it seems that they dont trust in the viewpoint of the physicists. <BR/><BR/>Clearly, there is a dispute “CHEMISTS vs PHYSICISTS”, and it seems that the controversy on cold fusion will be finally resolved, but not by the physicists.<BR/><BR/>The new duel chemists vs physicists has ideological origin. The physicits keep their loyalty to Quantum Mechanics, because they dont accept to change their interpretation on the zitterbewegung, since such a changing requires a very deep modification in the foundations of Modern Physics (the zbw cannot be considered as a helical trajetory in Quantum Field Theory, which is the successor of Quantum Mechanics).<BR/><BR/>Unlike, the chemists keep their loyalty to the scientific method, according to which any experiment cannot be neglected only because it defies the principles of a theory, as happens now in this duel between Quantum Mechanics and cold fusion.<BR/><BR/>Such new participation of chemists is healthy to science’s develolpment. Because as the physicists have some dogmas which they consider unsourmantable (as for instance their interpretation of the zitterbewegung in Quantum Field Theory), the development of cold fusion requires scientists free of dogmas of Physics, as the chemists.<BR/><BR/>In few words, we have to consider the following situation:<BR/><BR/>1- as cold fusion is impossible by considering the interpretation of zitterbewegung in Quantum Field Theory...<BR/><BR/>2- ... but as the experiments prove that cold fusion really occurs, as confirmed now by the experiments made in the US Navy...<BR/><BR/>3- ... then there is need to change the interpretation on the zitterbewegung (a new alternative that chemists probably will take in consideration starting from now)...<BR/><BR/>4- ... instead of neglecting the cold fusion experiments (as the physicists insist to do).W.GUGLINSKIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00591882265762178066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6888282.post-67397971299842830802009-03-31T19:47:00.000-06:002009-03-31T19:47:00.000-06:00Here is a bibliography of 3,500 papers on cold fus...Here is a bibliography of 3,500 papers on cold fusion, and 500 full text papers:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://lenr-canr.org" REL="nofollow">http://lenr-canr.org</A><BR/><BR/>Read all about it. Enjoy!Jed Rothwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179077151947615762noreply@blogger.com