Sunday, August 31, 2008

Sarah Palin and the possible faked pregnancy

God says we need to avoid gossip.

I want to avoid gossip.

It is wise to beware of rumors. "Don't believe everything you hear." Absolutely. But/and . . . isn't there a place where you need to investigate "your own side" in the same way you would investigate "the other side"?

I have found it so common: advocates for any particular position are happy to investigate virtually every rumor or whisper of malfeasance that has to do with "the opposition." They say such investigations are necessary to "get at the truth" and/or to build any sense of possible confidence in anything "the opposition" has to say.

But when it comes to "their own," if someone raises questions, their hackles rise in high dudgeon: "How dare you ask such things!"

I ask, "But what if these things are true? Shouldn't we know that?"

So I set off to find out if, and to what extent, there may be any validity to the rumor that Sarah Palin did not bear Trig, the son she now claims as her own.

And I will say, she looks bad either way: whether she bore Trig or not. She appears either to be a liar (for "a good cause," no doubt: to save her daughter's dignity), or she lacks discernment (why else would she put her baby's life at risk?), or, perhaps, despite her avowed commitment to life, she had a secret death-wish for her son.

Truly.

I find any one of these options rather disturbing for someone who intends to run our country. I want the highest ethics. And I'm afraid we're not finding them.

But I'll let you be the judge.

Having had two daughters bear children within the past five weeks, I find it impossible to believe as a completely factual account what the press reported concerning Trig's birth:
  • Mrs. Palin made a keynote luncheon address at the Republican Governor’s Energy Conference in Texas on April 17, after she noticed she had begun to leak amniotic fluid.
  • She then proceeded to the airport where she took a regularly-scheduled, eight-hour commercial flight back up to Anchorage.
  • Rather than having the baby in Anchorage, the state capital and the largest city in the state, she then proceeded to drive 44 miles from the Anchorage airport to the 74-bed Mat-Su Regional Medical Center located in a community with not even a fifth the population.
  • An hour later, she checked in with her doctor.
And then, finally,
  • Seven hours later, she had the baby.
Is this really what you would do if you had a Down syndrome baby? Is this what you would do if you had any kind of baby?

Hate to say it, but I'm skeptical.

For further discussion, see the comments at the end of the original article that brought this to my attention.

********

ETA (9/2/08): Reliable sources now report that Mrs. Palin's 17-year-old daughter is currently pregnant and expecting to give birth in December. So the pregnancy was not faked.

But now mom/Mrs. Prospective Vice President has two major "distractions" on her hands in the form of a very young, Down syndrome baby and an unmarried daughter who is pregnant. How can she keep up every end of all the jobs she's being called upon to fulfill?
  • Wife
  • Mom
  • Governor of Alaska
  • Vice Presidential Candidate
  • Human being

Will she be able to succeed where few--very few (any?)--men do?

2 comments:

  1. John, I have a lot of respect for you and thoroughly enjoy reading your blog but at first blush, this story seems improbable. Admittedly, I like the idea of Sarah Palin as McCain's VP a lot. But I do want to know the truth. Here are some holes I see in the story:

    For one thing, if Mrs. Palin were very fit and it had been 6 years since her previous child, her pregnancy might not show at 6-7 months. If it had been less time since her last child, she would show more quickly. Some women just don't look as pregnant as others do.

    About her flight home whilst "in labor", there are many stages of labor. Amniotic fluid leaking is not an urgent situation. Mild to Moderate contractions can continue for weeks before actual birth. She'd had four previous births and knew how her body handled labor.

    I have to say that if I were in Arizona (was that where she was?) and my water broke I would try to go home, too. Especially if my baby were special needs. I would want to be with the caregivers I knew and who knew me and my records. Under-informed practitioners can be very dangerous! I would feel extremely uncomfortable with a practitioner who believe the baby should have been aborted to begin with.

    She arrived 7 hours before the baby was born! I don't think she took any undue risks at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. John, I agree with holli. I respect your desire for truth, but this seems to be a bit, well, low? Is it something we need to know? I, too, am sick of politics. It's all such a spin.

    My two cents on her pregnancy:

    My mother was 35 when she had me (after 5 children born almost a decade before me). No one believed she was pregnant. I was over 5 lb, and she said she was in normal clothes for most of the pregnancy. My sister was born 7 years later, and again, people thought she was joking when she announced her pregnancy.

    Leaking fluid is not the same as your water breaking. Leaking fluid is a slow drip; water breaking is a flood. Is there concern over a leak? Yes, but it's not an emergency. Leaking fluid does not mean that labor has started.

    With one of my pregnancies, the ob/gyn broke my water to start labor. Nothing happened. Five hours later, pitocen was started to induce labor.

    Here's a thought-provoking question: Why would Sarah breastfeed if she hadn't been pregnant? Those who I know who have tried it, nursing after adoption, for example, have had very little success, even after using various natural foods/herbs and hours and hours and hours of pumping and nipple stimulation. They still had to supplement with formula.

    The nursing is what has me convinced that she bore Trig. The media said after the announcement, People magazine had to wait until she'd changed a diaper and pumped for an interview.

    This whole thing reminds me that the world never changes with regards to gossip. When my great-grandparents moved to a new town, the townspeople shunned them, because they believed my grandmother (a teenager) was the mother of the youngest son, who was about a decade younger than the youngest.

    Where does charity belong? Can we call Sarah to truth or holiness by publishing such a story on our blog? What is our responsibility to truth?

    ReplyDelete